A raw navel orange beats a raw Fuji apple on six of the seven nutrients both USDA rows let us compare, and the seventh — fiber — is a tie: 2g per 100g for the orange against 2.08g for the apple. The orange carries 7.2 times the calcium, 6.1 times the protein and 2.3 times the magnesium per 100g, for 47 calories against the apple's 52. The rows are USDA FoodData Central FDC 1750340 (apple) and FDC 746771 (orange).
That is less a story about oranges than about apples. Out of the 33 fruits in our database, the Fuji apple ranks last per 100 calories on protein, on magnesium and on zinc.
Is an orange healthier than an apple?
On every mineral and macronutrient the two rows share, yes — a raw navel orange has more protein, potassium, calcium, iron, magnesium and zinc per 100g than a raw Fuji apple, and the same fiber. "Healthier" is a bigger word than a composition table can carry, so read that as "more of these seven things per bite" and nothing broader.
| Per 100g | Apples, fuji, with skin, raw | Oranges, raw, navels | Orange ÷ apple |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories per 100g | 52 | 47 | 0.90× |
| Protein per 100g | 0.15g | 0.91g | 6.1× |
| Fiber per 100g | 2.08g | 2g | 0.96× |
| Potassium per 100g | 104mg | 166mg | 1.6× |
| Calcium per 100g | 5.98mg | 43mg | 7.2× |
| Iron per 100g | 0.02mg | 0.33mg | 16.5× |
| Magnesium per 100g | 4.67mg | 10.7mg | 2.3× |
| Zinc per 100g | 0.0168mg | 0.11mg | 6.5× |
Counting by calories barely moves anything — except fiber
Because the two fruits are only 10% apart in calories, re-basing per 100 calories widens each of the orange's leads by about a tenth and changes the winner on exactly one line: fiber, where the orange goes from 4% behind to 6% ahead. 100 calories is 192g of apple or 213g of orange, which is close enough that the basis you pick is not the argument here.
| Per 100 calories | Apples, fuji, with skin, raw | Oranges, raw, navels | Orange ÷ apple |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein per 100 kcal | 0.29g | 1.94g | 6.7× |
| Fiber per 100 kcal | 4g | 4.26g | 1.06× |
| Potassium per 100 kcal | 200mg | 353mg | 1.8× |
| Calcium per 100 kcal | 11.5mg | 91.5mg | 8.0× |
| Iron per 100 kcal | 0.04mg | 0.7mg | 18× |
| Magnesium per 100 kcal | 8.98mg | 22.77mg | 2.5× |
| Zinc per 100 kcal | 0.03mg | 0.23mg | 7.2× |
A 2.08g against 2g difference is a 4% gap on numbers USDA reports to a hundredth of a gram, measured on different fruit samples. Calling either fruit the fiber winner would be reading noise, so this post does not.
Where the apple ranks among 33 fruits
Per 100 calories, the raw Fuji apple is 33rd of 33 fruits in our database on protein, magnesium and zinc, 32nd on iron, 31st on potassium and 29th on calcium. Its best placing is fiber, 15th of the 29 fruits that carry a fiber value. The orange is mid-table on most of the same columns — 14th on protein, potassium and zinc, 16th on magnesium — so the gap in the tables above is the apple falling short more than the orange standing out.
There is one real exception. On calcium per 100 calories the navel orange is 2nd of 33 fruits, at 91.49mg, behind only raw lime at 110mg. That is the single column where the orange is genuinely unusual rather than simply ahead of a low bar.
The big multiples sit on small numbers
A 7.2-fold calcium lead still means 43mg per 100g of orange — 3.3% of the 1,300mg Daily Value on a US nutrition label. The same holds down the table: the orange's 166mg of potassium is 3.5% of the 4,700mg Daily Value, 10.7mg of magnesium is 2.5% of 420mg, and 0.33mg of iron is 1.8% of 18mg. Neither fruit is where you get these minerals; the orange just brings slightly more of them along.
The iron multiple deserves an extra warning. The apple row says 0.02mg, and a figure reported to a hundredth of a milligram could be anything from 0.015mg to 0.025mg, so the 16.5-fold gap per 100g is honestly somewhere between 13-fold and 22-fold.
What these two rows cannot tell you
Our Fuji apple row carries no vitamin C value, so vitamin C is left out of the comparison instead of being counted as a zero. The orange row holds 59.1mg per 100g — about 66% of the 90mg Daily Value — and 6th place per 100 calories among the 32 fruits with a figure. We will not print a vitamin C ratio against an apple number we do not have.
It runs the other way for sugar: the apple row lists 13.3g per 100g and the orange row lists none, so there is no sugar comparison here either. Total carbohydrate is present in both — 15.7g for the apple, 11.8g for the orange. And sodium, where the orange carries 9mg against the apple's 1.01mg, is 0.4% of a 2,300mg day and not worth choosing a fruit over.
Nothing here measures polyphenols, how full either fruit keeps you, or how the fiber behaves once eaten. Those are real questions; they are just not questions a USDA composition row answers.
Keep going
The per-100g side-by-side lives on apple vs orange, with the full rows on apple and orange. If protein is the column you care about, our highest-protein fruit post ranks all of them, and a banana every day works through what one fruit a day adds up to over a month.
Nobody weighs their fruit
Every figure above is per 100g, and an apple from the fruit bowl is not 100g — they run from small to enormous, and the difference is most of a snack. That is the part that makes fruit annoying to track, so most people simply stop logging it.
With Sunn you send "an orange" or "a big apple" on WhatsApp the way you would tell a friend. It estimates the weight, adds it to the day, and only asks a follow-up when the size would actually change your total.
Written by Espen Opdahl
Founder of Sunn. Building AI-powered nutrition coaching to make healthy eating simple. Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central database.
Medical disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making changes to your diet or exercise routine.