Salmon vs Mackerel

Side-by-side nutrition comparison per serving. See which fits your goals better.

Salmon and mackerel are nutritional twins at first glance — 208 vs 205 calories, 20.4g vs 18.6g protein, 13.4g vs 13.9g fat per 100g. The macros are so close you might wonder why this comparison even exists. But dig beneath the surface numbers and these are meaningfully different fish.

Mackerel is the omega-3 heavyweight champion. Atlantic mackerel packs even more EPA and DHA per serving than salmon, which is already considered the gold standard. It's also one of the most sustainable fish you can eat — mackerel populations are robust, the fish reproduce quickly, and they're low on the food chain, meaning minimal mercury accumulation.

The reason salmon wins the popularity contest is taste and texture. Salmon is buttery, clean, and approachable. Mackerel is intensely fishy, oily, and polarizing. People either love it or can't get past the first bite. Canned mackerel in particular has a strong flavor that takes getting used to. If you can develop a taste for it, mackerel gives you everything salmon does at a fraction of the price. Fresh mackerel is often the cheapest fatty fish at the counter.

Pro tip

Canned mackerel in olive oil is an underrated meal-prep shortcut. Flake it over rice bowls with pickled ginger, cucumber, soy sauce, and sesame seeds for a 5-minute omega-3 bomb. The strong flavor works perfectly in bold Asian-inspired preparations where salmon's subtlety would actually be a disadvantage.

Quick Verdict

Best for weight loss

Mackerel

Best for muscle gain

Salmon

Best for low-carb

Salmon

Macro Comparison

Salmon: 100g (100g)  |  Mackerel: 100g (100g)

CaloriesLower is better for weight loss

208

Salmon

vs

205

Mackerel

ProteinHigher supports muscle growth

20.4g

Salmon

vs

18.6g

Mackerel

CarbsLower for low-carb diets

0g

Salmon

vs

0g

Mackerel

FatLower for calorie control

13.4g

Salmon

vs

13.9g

Mackerel

Protein Efficiency

What percentage of calories come from protein — higher is better for staying lean.

39%

Salmon

36%

Mackerel

Track what you eat automatically

Send a photo of your salmon or mackerel meal to Sunn on WhatsApp and get instant calorie and macro tracking.

Take the free quiz

Per 100g Comparison

NutrientSalmonMackerel
Calories208205
Protein20.4g18.6g
Carbs0g0g
Fat13.4g13.9g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium59mg90mg
Cholesterol55mg70mg
Saturated Fat3.05g3.26g
Potassium363mg314mg
Vitamin A58mcg50mcg
Vitamin C3.9mg0.4mg
Calcium9mg12mg
Iron0.34mg1.63mg

Which Should You Choose?

For weight loss

Choose Mackerel. With 205 calories and 18.6g protein, it gives you more protein per calorie — keeping you full while cutting calories.

For muscle gain

Choose Salmon. Salmon delivers 20.4g protein per serving — 1.8g more than Mackerel.

For low-carb diets

Choose Salmon with 0g carbs per serving.

Getting consistent omega-3 intake doesn't require expensive salmon every time. Knowing affordable alternatives like mackerel — and actually eating them regularly — is part of building nutrition habits that last. Sunn helps you build consistency, which matters more than any single food choice.

Get a plan that fits your goals

Stop guessing. Sunn builds you a personalized nutrition plan based on your body, goals, and food preferences.

Take the free quiz

Common Questions

Is Salmon or Mackerel better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Mackerel is the better choice. Salmon has 208 calories and 20.4g protein per serving, while Mackerel has 205 calories and 18.6g protein. Lower calories with higher protein helps you stay full while eating fewer calories.

Which has more protein, Salmon or Mackerel?

Salmon has more protein per serving. Salmon provides 20.4g and Mackerel provides 18.6g of protein.

Can I eat both salmon and mackerel together?

Yes! Combining salmon and mackerel gives you 413 calories and 39g protein. This combination can work well as part of a balanced meal.

Compare More Foods